"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter. ... Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended ... thus the concept of particles cannot play a fundamental part, ... and can only appear as a limited region in space in which the field strength or energy density are particularly high."
(Albert Einstein, Metaphysics of Relativity, 1950)
"It is my firm belief that the last seven decades of the twentieth century will be characterized in history as the dark ages of theoretical physics. ... The quantum world is a world of waves, not particles."
(Carver Mead, Professor Emeritus at Caltech. Received $500,000 Lemelson-MIT Prize in 1999)
Note (Jan, 2008) This forum is currently locked. You are welcome to browse and read posts.
Forum will re-open in 2008 when work at our main
philosophy / physics site is completed. Thanks. Geoff Haselhurst
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MILO
Joined: 02 Jun 2005 Posts: 4 Location: Manhattan Beach, California
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:54 am Post subject: Meaning of Hubble constant and Big Bang |
|
|
Meaning of Hubble constant and Big Bang
Hi Forum members,
Someone wanted me to write on the Big Bang. I found 4 different ways to show that the problem of the Big-bang was how to interpret the meaning of the Hubble constant. All of them agreed which lends credibility.
The result was that the big-bang interpretation is wrong and instead the Hubble distance should be interpreted as the maximum distance we can see into an infinite universe.
If you think about it, this causes a red-shift with distance, because distant matter shares less of a common universe, thus less wave interactions, thus less energy exchange (which we see as a red-shift with distance).
I can send the (long) article to those who want to read it.
Cosmos,
Milo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haselhurst Site Admin

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Posts: 728 Location: Planet Earth, Milky Way, Universe, Infinite Space. Status: Endangered Species. Cause: Ignorance
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:46 am Post subject: Cosmology - Redshift with distance |
|
|
Hey Milo,
It was so nice to see you post at our WSM Forum. Good on ya! It cheered my heart.
I think of you every day, and lament the suffering of old age that you bear so stoically.
And what a great concise summary of the correct interpretation of redshift with distance.
I would just add that if we define universe as matter that we can see and interact with (where other matter's out-waves form our matter's in-waves) then it is best to write that Space is Infinite, we exist in a finite spherical universe within Infinite Space.
As you know (since you deduced this), this not only explains redshift with distance, but also explains Mach's Principle (mass of a body is determined by all other matter in finite spherical universe within infinite space).
Just a quick reply - great to have you here!!
Cosmos,
Geoff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harry Costas
Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 98 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello All
I did not know that there is a Max distance that we can see.
Where can I look this up.
As for the Big Bang, a theory with ad hoc ideas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|