Simple Science Forum - Dynamic Unity of Reality
Philosophy Physics Metaphysics of Space - The Wave Structure of Matter (WSM)
The Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) is the most simple language for describing Reality, founded on One thing existing, Space, with Properties of a Continuous Infinite Eternal Wave Medium. While the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) is not yet well known, it clearly explains and solves many of the fundamental problems of Science (Metaphysics Philosophy Physics) by explaining how matter (and thus humans) are necessarily interconnected to other matter in Space within the Universe. We think this knowledge is important, hope that you find it interesting and will enjoy pondering upon (and discussing!) this new perspective for understanding physical reality.
"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter. ... Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended ... thus the concept of particles cannot play a fundamental part, ... and can only appear as a limited region in space in which the field strength or energy density are particularly high."
(Albert Einstein, Metaphysics of Relativity, 1950)
"It is my firm belief that the last seven decades of the twentieth century will be characterized in history as the dark ages of theoretical physics. ... The quantum world is a world of waves, not particles."
(Carver Mead, Professor Emeritus at Caltech. Received $500,000 Lemelson-MIT Prize in 1999)
Note (Jan, 2008) This forum is currently locked. You are welcome to browse and read posts.
Forum will re-open in 2008 when work at our main
philosophy / physics site is completed. Thanks. Geoff Haselhurst
|
|
Please read Posting Guidelines and try to search and read on relevant subjects of Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) before posting.
And the Google Toolbar is great as it allows you to check spelling in forms before posting. Please try to use it! Thanks.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nalxhal
Joined: 05 May 2007 Posts: 1 Location: Greece
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 3:36 pm Post subject: fine structure of space |
|
|
Hi to all !
I think I have some new idea about quantised space as a conclution of my research
fine structure of space 1/2π
http://www.wbabin.net/science/alexandris8.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northjetty
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 302 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you figured out how your personal understanding relates to the continuous wave medium of space? Give us a simple break down so we can get a feel for where you're coming from here with this information.
ps-Post's that 'do not relate to WSM' will be 'deleted' as 'spam' in time, so a 'clear understanding' is in order when some one brings 'theories' and 'ideas' to the WSM forum. We look forward to seeing the simple connection.
northjetty/space
Last edited by northjetty on Sun May 06, 2007 3:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aireal
Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 211 Location: Mayfield, Kentucky. U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nalxhal
The point Northjetty is trying to make is, how does this relate to W.S.M. theory.
Does the "fine structure of space 1/2n" help define Space as a continuous wave medium?
We get a lot of ideas presented to us, but not everyone on our forum are qualified to look at scientific papers and evaluate them. Those that do have the skill are swamped with work already.
So we need you to help us.
Read over the basics of W.S.M. theory and tell us how your work and others relate to it. You must have felt it had some connection to mention it here. But what is clear to the creator of a theory, may not be seen so readily by others. If it does not relate to W.S.M. theory than this is not the place for it, regardless of its value. Being aware of the terms used by W.S.M. and how conventional terminology may need to be reworded for viewers of this forum.
As for the paper linked to in your post, is it yours or did it inspire you? Your first post did not give much detail. I have been to wbabin.net some, even cited a fine paper from there for my post on a W.S.M. based model of the atom. http://www.physics-philosophy-metaphysics.com/forum/w-s-m-and-bohr-s-hydrogen-atom-t511.html
I glanced at the paper and it looks note worthy and deserving of a more detailed reading when I have the time.
Thank you for your help
Charles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|